Is Soul Yatri actually an anti-social-media app or just marketing?
The current public product has no public follower count or infinite public feed. It uses bounded reflection, intentional matching, journaling, courses, practitioner discovery, and relationship tools instead of public popularity mechanics. This describes current product design, not an unverifiable promise about every future metric or business decision.
What does Soul Yatri replace if I delete Instagram, TikTok, or BeReal?
Soul Yatri does not replace the entertainment function of social media. Its narrower role is private reflection and intentional connection through Soul Circle, journaling, practitioner discovery, courses, relationship tools, and bounded Yatri AI prompts.
How is Soul Yatri different from feed-based or group-messaging products?
Feed-based and group-messaging products organise activity around posts, rooms, or audience updates. Soul Yatri starts from a private reflection, a specific bond, or a stated intent and offers a bounded next step. The current product has no public follower count or infinite public feed.
Will Soul Yatri ever add a feed, follower count, or likes?
The current product direction excludes a public follower count and infinite public feed. If that direction changes, the public documentation and privacy implications should be reviewed and disclosed rather than hidden behind a permanent promise.
How does Soul Yatri make money if it is not optimising engagement?
Soul Yatri is exploring product usage, consultations, courses, subscriptions, and organisational wellness pathways. Revenue and optimisation choices can evolve, so this page does not claim that the business model permanently eliminates every engagement incentive.
Is there research that says social media actually causes mental-health harm?
Research and public-health reviews have identified associations and plausible risks, especially for some young people and patterns of use, but effect sizes, causality, mechanisms, and individual differences remain debated. The responsible conclusion is narrower: product mechanics, age, context, content, and time spent can matter, so platforms should be evaluated with transparent evidence rather than a universal harm claim.